Boletín Agrario boletinagrario.com in english: Info, resources and news about farming, animal husbandry,fishing, food industry and rural development

Foods in theGreengrocery
Origin Prices

0.53

Wholesale Prices

0.86

Retail Prices

1.82

Variation between sections of the agri-food Chain
+62.5%+111%
between the crop and the consumer's table there is an increase in the price of +242.8%
Origin Prices

The origin middle value of the Agricultural Price Index along the week from 16 to 22 of May 2016 reached the 0.53 euros, which meant an increase of 0.76% in relation to price of the previous week, that was 0.53€ (+0€), and was placed a 3.92% above the annual average of 0.51€ recorded (+0.02€).

The highest weekly value achieved throughout the year of 0.61 euros was 14.53% higgher than the selected week (+0.08€), while the lowest value during the period was 0.41, that is 30.86% lower than the 0.53€ of 20th week of 2016 (-0.13€).

In relation to the values of the previous year, in 20th week of 2016 there was a year-on-year increase of 29.27%, 0.12 euros above the 0.41€ reached in the same week of 2015.

Wholesale Prices

Regarding the wholesale average, this reached the 0.861 euros, which meant a increase of 1.06% in relation to price of the previous week, that was 0.85€ (+0.01€), and was placed a -4.33% under the annual average of 0.9€ recorded (-0.04€).

The highest weekly value achieved throughout the year of 1.02 euros was 18.82% higgher than the selected week (+0.16€), while the lowest value during the period was 0.82, that is 5.13% lower than the 0.861€ of 20th week of 2016 (-0.04€).

In relation to the values of the previous year, in 20th week of 2016 there was a year-on-year increase of 5.13%, 0.04 euros above the 0.82€ reached in the same week of 2015.

Retail Prices

Regarding the retail average, this reached the 1.817 euros, which meant a decline of -0.49% in relation to price of the previous week, that was 1.83€ (-0.01€), and was placed a -0.44% under the annual average of 1.83€ recorded (-0.01€).

The highest weekly value achieved throughout the year of 1.93 euros was 6.33% higgher than the selected week (+0.11€), while the lowest value during the period was 1.75, that is 3.89% lower than the 1.817€ of 20th week of 2016 (-0.07€).

In relation to the values of the previous year, in 20th week of 2016 there was a year-on-year increase of 3%, 0.05 euros above the 1.76€ reached in the same week of 2015.

Evolutions of week 20 of 2016
Annual average

0.51

  0.02€ (+3.77%)
Annual average

0.9

  -0.04€ (-4.53%)
Annual average

1.83

  -0.01€ (-0.44%)
Previous week

0.53

  0€ (+0.75%)
Previous week

0.85

  0.01€ (+1.05%)
Previous week

1.83

  -0.01€ (-0.5%)
Next week

0.51

  0.03€ (+4.72%)
Next week

0.88

  -0.02€ (-2.44%)
Next week

1.81

  0.01€ (+0.55%)
20th week of 2015

0.41

  0.12€ (+22.64%)
20th week of 2015

0.82

  0.04€ (+4.88%)
20th week of 2015

1.76

  0.05€ (+2.92%)
20th week of 2017

0.45

  0.09€ (+16.04%)
20th week of 2017

0.93

  -0.07€ (-7.78%)
20th week of 2017

1.85

  -0.04€ (-1.93%)
  • Weekly and year-on-year values of recorded prices in week 20 of 2016
  • Click on each box to reproduce its trend graph
Crops PIOR

3.43

Price Index Origin-Retail. This is the number of times the price is multiplied from what the producer receives to what the consumer pays (origin and retail)

Construction of Retail's Average Price of the Agricultural Price Index during Week 20 of 2016
About this data

This is an application developed and maintained by Boletín Agrario, so it should be considered as such for review and intellectual property purposes. The data used corresponds to that published by::

Global Food Price Indexes ➡️ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Prices of the Agri-food chain in Spain ➡️ Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of the Government of Spain

Disclaimer

Remember that, like the other contents of this portal, the information we offer is purely indicative and should be used as such. Boletín Agrario declines any responsibility or obligation arising from errors or deficiencies in the data offered, as well as its possible misuse.